Posting tweet...
Mimico waterfront: Another “wall of condos” disaster in the making?
In 1997 Doug Holyday, then mayor of Etobicoke, announced plans for a new neighbourhood: Humber Bay Shores. The former “motel strip” — a seedy area south of Lake Shore Blvd. W. and east of Park Lawn Rd. — saw its first new condo a year later.
Since then, highrises have sprouted like toadstools.
“There’s very large numbers of people in buildings that are just higgledy-piggledy scattered across that area. There’s no coherent pattern of public spaces, there’s no shopping or retail,” says Ken Greenberg, an architect and urban designer who has consulted for Waterfront Toronto.
“It’s one of the most egregious, terrible examples of lack of any kind of decent planning one can think of.”
Some may disagree. But many in Mimico — the next community over, where a massive revitalization plan known as “Mimico 20/20” is underway — look east to Humber Bay Shores as a warning.
“The multi-multi-multi-storey buildings? It scares me,” says Bob Poldon, president of the Mimico Residents Association.
…
Via The Star
Having lived in the area for several years, I truly believe that the high-rise condos on the water are the last thing Mimico needs.
Why can’t our city learn to capitalize on one of our greatest assets (the lake) and instead allows unimaginative, greedy developers permanently change the face of the city? Why are we building a shoebox of a city instead of a tourist destination?
Do you think ten years from now Toronto will take the top spot in National Geographic’s Top Trolley Rides? With a view of hideous concrete and glass – I doubt it.
Toronto doesn’t lack imagination – it lacks leadership to translate it to sound development policy.
I’m always amazed by the junk mail that comes in around Christmas. I don’t celebrate the holiday, but I still get a good chuckle out of the spam.
This one takes the cake. It’s Santa, soliciting custom letters for your kids. Must be tough feeding the reindeer and keeping unionized elf staff when the economy is in the dumpster.

The best part? When you try to unsubscribe, a bright red screen fills you with insurmountable guilt over your child’s unfulfilled wish.

I am going to save this one along with “Easter bunny pâté – on sale at 30% off”.
Amongst likely voters who have decided who they would vote for, 45.6 per cent say they would make Ford the next mayor.
Via CTV
It boggles my mind someone like Rob Ford can have so much support in the city. Why? Actually, wait, I’m not all that surprised. Granted, I’m not a huge fan of other candidates (all of them), but Ford is an illiterate clown. I am not going to dissect his platform in this post, but I do want to give you an idea of how the reported support statistics give us a skewed idea of his widespread support.

Assuming a similar turnout, I estimate that 46% Rob Ford votes will come from approximately 269,100 city residents (46% of 585,000). Based on that assumption, we are letting approximately 11% of Toronto residents elect Rob Ford to lead this world-class city.
Ford doesn’t seem all that popular once you break down the numbers. But obviously he struck the right chord with quite a few voters. There is no easy answer to who should lead Toronto - selecting the right candidate isn’t easy when the choices are so limited. Unfortunately I don’t find the other candidates to be more promising so it’s a tough choice to make.
But, there is a real possibility of Rob Ford becoming a mayor. And that’s scary (to me).
Whether you support him or not, take a look at the data, do some research and take 15 minutes out of your day to make an educated vote – don’t let others do it for you. Otherwise you let the 11% minority opinion run your city for the next 4 years. I am an eligible voter and taxpayer and believe that he doesn’t represent the majority opinion in this city.
Statistics: City of Toronto, CTV
Photo: CCUE

WIND, the first new mobile service provider to enter the Canadian market in ten years, launched in Toronto and Calgary in December of 2009 and was expected to provide fresh competition in the Canadian wireless market by offering low-cost plans and services as an alternative to Bell Mobility, Telus and Rogers Wireless which have dominated the Canadian market for decades. Canadians have long complained of high cellphone bills in comparison to much of the world and many consumers were expecting WIND to make a dent in mobile service prices by introducing low rates and forcing competitors to follow suit, but it doesn’t seem like to be the case so far.
The other day I was asked by Brand New to write a critique on an identity for Wind, a new mobile provider in Canada. You can read the full article here.

What are you trying to say, Ryerson?